Stanisland Magazine

Charting the Path to Peace: International Responsibility and Historical Roots of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict remains a lasting focal point of global attention. Recent events have once again brought this longstanding dispute into the limelight, with both nations responsible for the loss of nearly a thousand lives in either direction, in a perpetual cycle of violence of prejudice on both sides.

To grasp the complexity of this ongoing crisis, it is crucial to follow the historical, political, and ideological foundations that have collectively contributed to the current state of affairs. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is deeply rooted in historical grievances and territorial disputes, which have left scars on the region’s sands for generations.

Hamas: A Product of Palestinian Suffering

Hamas, emerging in the early 1980s, can be viewed as a direct outcome of Palestinian suffering and a desire for self-determination. The group are often condemned for directing its weaponry towards Israeli civilians and enjoys substantial support from a significant portion of the Palestinian population, who voted for their governance following years of oppression from the Israeli regime.

Israel: A Nation with European Roots

The State of Israel, established following years of lobbying and campaigns to create a “Jewish homeland”, remains a point of contention following an influx of pro-Zionist immigrants. Its existence remains a symbol of depression for many of its neighbours, particularly the Palestinians, as it represents how easily displaced Arabs can be following years of Western interference, particularly given the protracted and intractable nature of the conflict. Looking at more recent conflicts, the rise of militant groups (such as Daesh) is a direct consequence of interventionism largely by North American and European coalitions.

The Ongoing Conflict in Israel and Palestine

Enduring fighting has protracted the conflict for an insurmountable period and brought about dire humanitarian consequences. Palestinians, in particular, have endured severe deprivations of fundamental necessities, including food, clean water, and essential humanitarian aid. This crisis has not only deepened the suffering of innocent civilians but also perpetuated the cycle of violence, further underscoring the urgency of finding a sustainable resolution to this longstanding conflict.

What is the Two-State Solution and How Can it be Implemented?

The most obvious solution to the conflict is to implement the long and enduring two-state solution. This is a proposed pathway for resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, offering the promise of two distinct and self-governing nations: one for Israel and another for the Palestinian people. Unfortunately, years of Israeli bulldozing of Palestinian land, the abduction of children and unrestrained killings have only stalled talks for years, leading to rockets being fired in retaliation by Hamas.

The problem is, that neither Israel nor Hamas have aspirations to implement it, and even if strong ambitions were met, there are still no guarantees that Israel will relent on the continuing annexation of land from Palestinian families. The first step will be for Hamas to withdraw from government following a democratic vote, and for Israel to guarantee there will be no military or military-supported civilian incursions on Arab land.

International Role and Responsibility

Prejudice and bitterness, long-standing companions in this strife, continue to flourish. It is crucial to emphasize that these sentiments are formidable obstacles to achieving lasting peace. Resolving this conflict can only be realized through dialogue, reconciliation, and a shared determination to coexist.

READ: Israeli Human Rights Violations in Palestine: Understanding the Situation

Amid this poignant narrative, there is a universal plea for empathy, mutual understanding, and a comprehensive peace process. The responsibility for facilitating this process lies with the international community, tasked with guiding both parties towards reconciliation, urging them to engage in constructive dialogue and seek common ground.

British and United States Accountability: A Necessary Acknowledgment

The British, in particular, hold a unique responsibility in resolving this conflict, given their historical involvement in the region. The origins of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict can be traced back to the British Mandate for Palestine, established after World War I. The decisions made during this period, such as the Balfour Declaration of 1917, played a significant role in shaping the present-day tensions. As a result, the British, as key historical stakeholders, carry a particular responsibility to support and promote a peaceful resolution to this enduring conflict. Their role in acknowledging historical events and working towards reconciliation is crucial in the pursuit of lasting peace in the region.

Additionally, the United States also holds a significant obligation to contribute to the resolution of this conflict. The U.S. has provided substantial military aid to Israel, which has played a major role in the ongoing situation. It has strengthened Israel’s foothold in the region through the displacement of Palestinians in order to further expand Israeli settlements by largely Western immigrants, thereby hindering the peace process. Therefore, acknowledging this responsibility and working to ensure that aid contributes to a just and lasting resolution is a vital step in promoting peace and stability in the region.

Final Thoughts on the Challenges that Lie Ahead

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a powerful litmus test of our shared humanity and dedication to finding justice and peace. It stands as a stark symbol of the difficulties of finding a resolution, reminding us that the wounds of history run deep. However, the history books also tell stories of reconciliation, even when hostility seems to have far removed us from a comfortable ending. It is an urgent call to action that resounds within us all.

Photo: Raimond Klavins